User talk:8planets
Welcome!
[edit]Hi 8planets! I noticed your contributions to Draft:Jennifer L. Hall (judge) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 02:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Wally Adeyemo... Andrew Manuel Crespo... Justin Driver... Mario García (judge)... Rochelle Mercedes Garza... Amparo Monique Guerra... Deepak Gupta (attorney)... Shammara Henderson... Jacy J. Hurst... Leah Litman... Nico Martinez... Merritt McAlister... Camille McMullen... Lee Merritt... Melissa Murray (academic)... Jennifer Nou... Elizabeth Prelogar... Ajmel Quereshi... John Rappaport... Allison Riggs... Cristina M. Rodríguez... Victor A. Rodriguez (judge)... Alexandra Schimmer... Kate A. Shaw... Cecillia Wang... Bryant Y Yang
Here are the active GW Bush judges that do not have pictures.
Clay Daniel Land, Jay Christopher Zainey, Christopher Charles Conner, David Charles Godbey, Jose E. Martinez, James Edgar Kinkeade, Alia Moses,Thomas Alexander Varlan, Philip Peter Simon, Louise Wood Flanagan, Robert David Proctor, Ronald Allen White, Marcia Ann Cain Crone, Kenneth Michael Karas, Paul Steven Diamond, Jane Ellen Jackson Boyle, Robert Bryan Harwell, Timothy Carroll Batten Sr., Thomas Edward Johnston, Aida Milagros Delgado-Colón, Susan Davis Wigenton, Renee Marie Bumb, Thomas Lamson Ludington, Gregory Kent Frizzell, Robert James Jonker, Timothy D. DeGiusti, William Lindsay Osteen Jr., Martin Karl Reidinger, Sharion Marie Aycock, Robert Michael Dow Jr., Joseph Normand Laplante, Thomas David Schroeder, James Randal Hall, Mark Steven Davis, Glenn Thomas Suddaby, Cathy Seibel, Eric Franklin Melgren
October 2023
[edit]
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:MIAJudges. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- That was done in error as I was trying to copy the names they had on their page & I accidentally deleted it in error. But thank you
- 8planets (talk) 21:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- That seems odd: you, an editor who exclusively edits about judges, copied content from another editor who exclusively edited about judges. More to the point, that editor was blocked a month before you registered, so you never interacted with them. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nothing odd buddy. There's about a dozen of us on a blog about the judiciary. We have been on it for years. That user isn't on Wikipedia anymore updating the articles & the rest of us use Wikipeida for looking up judges. So we are all taking up the slack. That's why there's a number of new users here updating. I didn't know how to do so, so just getting some help from other users. If you ever see me make a mistake feel free to chime in as well. Thanks
- 8planets (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I had no idea there was off-wiki coordination about these niche topics. I just assumed it was too weird of an interest for multiple people to discuss. Here I am, entirely atomized in my editing. I seldom discussed my editing even when I attended live in-person editing events. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yup. It's a pretty popular blog actually. There's a couple of dozen of us that regularly comment on it & often reference Wikipedia... Lol
- 8planets (talk) 03:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I had no idea there was off-wiki coordination about these niche topics. I just assumed it was too weird of an interest for multiple people to discuss. Here I am, entirely atomized in my editing. I seldom discussed my editing even when I attended live in-person editing events. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- That seems odd: you, an editor who exclusively edits about judges, copied content from another editor who exclusively edited about judges. More to the point, that editor was blocked a month before you registered, so you never interacted with them. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
8planets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked because another user was blocked. I am a part of several new Wikipedia users from a blog about the judiciary and I seem to be the only one that was blocked for some reason. If you check the IP addresses you can see all (I can speak for myself but I assume it to be true for the others as well are different. We all are mostly interested in the judiciary and looking at Wikipedia for updates. When the other user stopped updating Wikipedia, some of us started. 8planets (talk) 21:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This seems to be an admission of WP:MEAT and means the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 22:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
8planets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello. We were not recruited to advance anybody’s agenda. All of us have been on a blog about the federal judiciary together for years. We all use Wikipedia regularly. We did not want to see the pages for federal judges not be updated as often as before so we decided we would open accounts & help out. We do not have an agenda in any fashion other than having up to date and accurate information about the federal judiciary. 8planets (talk) 22:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't have to have a nefarious motive or agenda in order to be engaging in meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.